Not that I would ever make chocolate mousse, but I'm sure Julia Child was the Mistress of such. This post isn't really about Julia Child. Being who I am and raised where I was, I never got into Julia's particular brand of the art of cooking. My friend, Pam Madsen, though, just connected some dots on her blog, The Fertility Advocate, in that way she does -- bringing together seemingly disparate ideas and people and events, alluding to the ever-reconfiguring human web.
Seems Pamela is a big Julia Child fan, so she was eager to see the newly released "Julie & Julia". The draw for Pam isn't so much the cooking part, or even specifically the great chef's infertility. It's the fact that Child was a whole package, and the movie presented her thus.
Famous people, celebrities, are almost inherently one-dimensional to us. The lurid tabloid details titillate us, though the balancing affect of a story's 'other side' is sometimes, frankly, boring. But to our bigger brains, the complexity of human nature and the unfolding events that seem to swirl around us make far more interesting stories than any single aspect, no matter how outstanding that one grain of persona seems at first glance.
Pam and I both share a fascination with the "bags of soup" (thanks, Jason, for that label) that we call 'people'. There's so much going on there, inside our visible shells. It's not that any of us always likes each ingredient, but the end result, the final dish, is the treasure.
Here's to dotted lines, between longing and contentment, and all the intriguing spaces between the dots...
re far more dishes we’ll be trying from the book.

